A Linear alternative for broader teams

Built for every team, not just software issues.

Kanera gives technical and non-technical teams a shared home for projects, requests, delivery, and recurring work.

Why teams look for a Linear alternative.

Shaped around software issues

Issues, cycles, triage, and releases suit engineering. Operations, marketing, and client teams often find the model narrower than their work.

Little room for custom structure

Linear uses opinionated issue properties and labels rather than general-purpose custom fields.

No calendar and no Gantt

Linear does not present a general card calendar, or a Gantt chart with schedule dependencies.

What changes when you move from Linear.

Comes with you

  • Board views and filtered, grouped tables
  • Assignees, labels, blocking relations, and bulk updates
  • An API, webhooks, and an MCP server for AI clients
  • Issue rows, through a CSV import

Kanera adds

  • Typed custom fields, shared across a workspace
  • Calendar, plus Gantt Timeline with critical paths across boards
  • Checklists with item assignees and due dates
  • Nested notes, and self-hosting with the full feature set

Stays with Linear

  • Cycles, triage, releases, and product insights
  • Deep code and Git integrations
  • Native desktop and mobile apps, SAML, and SCIM

Linear vs Kanera, feature by feature.

All 28 rows of the full comparison, reduced to marks. The comparison explains every one, with sources checked August 11, 2026.

  • Included
  • Partial or plan-gated
  • Not available

Views & Planning

FeatureLinearKanera
Timeline, Gantt, and dependenciesPartial or plan-gatedIncluded
Board viewIncludedIncluded
Table viewIncludedIncluded
Calendar viewNot availableIncluded
Overview, health, and cross-project visibilityIncludedIncluded
Personal and team priority queuesPartial or plan-gatedIncluded

Cards & Work

FeatureLinearKanera
Work item detailIncludedIncluded
Custom fieldsPartial or plan-gatedIncluded
ChecklistsPartial or plan-gatedIncluded
Bulk editingIncludedIncluded

Structure & Workflow

FeatureLinearKanera
Independent projectsIncludedIncluded
Shared structurePartial or plan-gatedIncluded
AutomationIncludedIncluded
ReportingIncludedIncluded
One-way board syncingNot availableIncluded

Collaboration & Access

FeatureLinearKanera
CollaborationIncludedIncluded
External accessPartial or plan-gatedPartial or plan-gated
Notes and contextPartial or plan-gatedIncluded
NotificationsIncludedIncluded

Data & Migration

FeatureLinearKanera
API and webhooksIncludedIncluded
AI integrationIncludedPartial or plan-gated
DeploymentNot availableIncluded
Import and exportIncludedPartial or plan-gated

Where each tool draws the line

FeatureLinearKanera
Time tracking and workloadPartial or plan-gatedPartial or plan-gated
Request formsPartial or plan-gatedNot available
Sign-in and provisioningIncludedPartial or plan-gated
Apps and offline useIncludedPartial or plan-gated
Interface languagesNot availableIncluded
Read the full Linear vs Kanera comparisonWhat each mark means, where Linear is stronger, pricing context, and FAQs.

Moving from Linear.

Start with CSV when issue rows are enough. Cycles, releases, project structure, history, and attachments need an explicit migration plan because they do not map directly.

  1. Upload and analyzeKanera reads the export and previews every column before anything is created.
  2. Map the structureCreate, reuse, or skip each list, label, and custom field.
  3. Match the peopleMap each source assignee to someone with access, or leave them unmapped.
  4. Review, then confirmA summary shows every mapping and skipped card. Only confirming creates data.

Choose Kanera when the whole company works in one system.

Competitor details are dated and sourced. Review the official sources in the direct comparison.

  • Work extends beyond product and engineering
  • You prefer boards over issue-first workflows
  • Shared reporting and project context should span every function

See if Kanera fits your team.

Start with a 30-day Pro trial. No card required.

Start free